The All Progressives Congress,
APC has rebuffed the rebellion of the Buba Galadima led Reformed All
Progressives Congress, RAPC with a four point criminal charge against the
leaders of the group. The
National Legal Adviser of the APC, Mr. Babatunde Ogala in a statement made
available to Vanguard at the weekend also denounced the formation of the group
as grievous to law saying that its emergence was likened to a coup. Asserting
that the convention was properly organised against the claim of the RAPC, Ogala
said that the convention was the culmination of a series of congresses even as
he affirmed that the Galadima group did not follow such route.
He also said the APC national
convention was validated by Independent National Electoral Commission, INEC officials.
He thus laid a four count charge of impersonation, fraudulent
misrepresentation, conduct likely to breach the peace and Breach of Trademark
and Infringement of Copy Right.
He said: “Mr. Galadima in his
Press Release copiously referred to himself as the substantive Chairman of
R-APC a variant of APC whilst he knows full well that there is indeed no such
political party in Nigeria. Also, he also suggests that he is the substantive
Chairman of APC even though he knows that Com. Adams Oshiomole is indeed the
party Chairman and Mr. Galadima never contested for Chairmanship at the just
concluded convention of the APC. In the circumstance, Mr. Galadima has
committed the offence of impersonation as defined and punishable under Section
484 of the Criminal Code and the authorities will be requested to do their work
in bringing him to account.
“To the extent that Mr. Galadima
continues to perpetuate a falsehood knowing such falsehood of him forming a
Political Party overnight and being Chairman either of same party or APC indeed
to be untrue yet persists for the purpose of gaining either pecuniary or other
benefits, he is guilty of fraudulent misrepresentation. In Ikechukwu Ikpa vs.
The State (2018) 4 NWLR Part 1069 Page 175 – 240, the Supreme Court defines Fraudulent
Misrepresentation to mean; “Without a doubt, the declaration of Mr. Galadima if
left unchecked is capable of leading to the public nuisance and a breach of
peace across Country. Our loyal members are already agitated by the incendiary
action of this group which runs counter to the beliefs, principles and creed of
the APC.
“As Nigerians are aware, the coinage APC is
both a mark and a copy right capable of being protected under the common law
principles of passing off as well as under the extant provisions of the
Copyright’s Act. Nigerians can only imagine what it would be like if we were to
wake up one morning to a bank claiming to the Reformed First Bank Plc or a
Construction company claiming to be the Reformed Julius Berger Plc formed by a
group of its directors allegedly because they disagree with certain decisions
taken at the board meeting! This will be viewed as a blatant assault on the
brand for which both civil and criminal recourse can be sought.“ Background:
Two days ago, on July 4, 2018, we witnessed a Press Conference by one Mr. Buba
Galadima speaking allegedly on behalf of a group of politicians who claim to be
of our Party the All Progressives Congress (APC). His very act (as we will show
later in this address) taken together with the content of his Press Release
were reminiscent of the televised military address issued after a successful
execution of a Coup De Tat which Nigerians had become used to before the advent
of this sustained democratic experience. The only difference being that Mr.
Galadima was gabbed in civilian attire. Furthermore, other persons purporting
to be members of this group have gone to town seeking to validate this unruly
conduct and these have necessitated the APC as the ruling party responsible for
the protection of our budding democracy to clarify on the legal import of the
action of this group as well as confirm to our teeming supporters across the
country that this situation is well within our control and assure all that the
rule of law must take its natural course in this matter. What Are The Issues At
Stake? Ladies and Gentlemen, the sum total of Mr. Galadima’s Press Release can
be captured under 3 (Three) major issues and we will address each of them
subsequently; That the Party’s convention was improperly conducted by the
Convention Chairman as Consensus candidates were only subjected to a ‘yes’ vote
in alleged contravention of Article 20 of the APC Constitution. That a group of
delegates have come together 10 (Ten) days after the successful conduct of the
APC convention to, in their words, ‘take control and give legitimacy’ to APC
now to be known as Reformed APC (‘R-APC). That R-APC whose congresses and
convention date is yet to be disclosed already has the full complement of
national executives, national working committee, state executives and local
government officials in all 774 local government areas across the country.
(a).On the first issue regarding the convention of APC held on June 23, 2018
let me make it clear that it was the culmination of a series of congresses
conducted in over 166,000 wards across this country and all the 36 states
including the Federal Capital Territory which produced the delegates. The
question of elections within the APC is covered by Article 20 of the APC
Constitution. Specifically, Section 20 (1) provides that ‘All Party posts
prescribed or implied by this constitution shall be filled by democratically
conducted elections at the respective National Convention or Congress subject,
where possible to consensus, Provided that where a candidate has emerged by
consensus for an elective position, a vote of ‘yes’ or ‘no’ by ballot or voice
shall be called to ensure that it was not an imposition which could breed
discontent and crisis’. A clear reading of this provision shows that delegates
may consent to a single candidate; however that consent must be
validated/re-affirmed at the convention. This was exactly the case at the
convention where candidates who emerged based on consensus had their elections
validated and affirmed by voice votes of the delegates. This much was admitted
by Galadima in his civilian take-over speech. It is therefore worrisome that he
goes ahead to suggest that the affirmation process was flawed because only a
‘yes’ question was put to the delegates and not a ‘yes’ and ‘no’ question. In
any case, considering that this question condescends on the interpretation of a
legal document, I would have expected Galadima and his gang to consult a lawyer
who should have told them that the use of the word ‘or’ in a legal document
connotes that it is disjunctive. So a party is at liberty to choose between two
options and exercising only one of both options would amount to compliance with
the provisions contained in such a document. This was the decision of the Court
in the case of Nwaogwugu v. President F.R.N. (2007) All FWLR (Pt. 358) 1151 at
1171 Paras G-H, where the Court held as follows:
“The use of the word “or” in a
statute connotes disjunctive participle used to express an alternative or to
give a choice of one among two or more things. The word always bears a
disjunctive meaning in an enactment. It separates the provision preceding it
from the provision coming after it. Its role is to show that the other
provisions in which it is appearing are distinct and separate one from the
other…” From the above, it is clear that the convention chairman only had to
ask a ‘yes’ (ie affirmation) question or a ‘no’ (i.e a dissent) question but
certainly not a ‘yes’ and ‘no’ question. For Mr. Galadima to seek to threaten
our democracy based on his misconceived interpretation of the word ‘or’ is a
testament to his desperation and sense of impunity. Overall, were the mischief,
spirit and intendment of the provision of Article 20 not complied with? One
would have expected a law-abiding person who is confused about the law or
disenchanted with a process to approach the appropriate judicial authorities to
seek redress instead of resorting to self-help and embarking on criminal acts
in the name of being aggrieved. (b).On the second issue raised above which is
the claim by the Mr. Galadima that APC delegates have decided to take control
and given legitimacy to APC as well as formed the Reformed APC, this only
reveals the extent of disregard for our laws and constituted authorities by
this group. You have to ask them at what point did they conduct congresses to
elect delegates to their Political Party? Or was it the same delegates who
conducted themselves in an orderly manner at the APC convention of June 23,
2018 that this group speaks of 10 days after? Does this group realize that
political parties are not conjured into existence by wishful thinking but by
careful compliance with the cumbersome process of registration laid out in
section 78 of the Electoral Act 2010? There is no provision for civilian coups
in the constitution of APC and any suggestion that their action was carried out
in consonance with the APC constitution is as misconceived as it is
mischievous. (c).On the third point of the R-APC electing executives across the
country, the question to ask this group that claims to be aggrieved because of
an alleged breach of a provision in the APC constitution requiring ‘yes’ and
‘no’ voice vote is, where did they hold their own convention? Is it not a
requirement of the same APC constitution that positions must be subjected to
election either democratically of through consensus? Were the so called
executives of this new contraption elected by consensus or by contestation?
Have they ever heard of or read the provisions of Section 85 of the Electoral Act?
Have they seen the Guidelines for the Registration of New Political Parties
2014? Where officials of the Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC)
at their imaginary congress? These are questions that speak to the real intent
of this group which is to perpetuate impunity, breach public peace by causing
political pandemonium and reap benefits from the vandalization of our
democratic process. But APC will not allow that. Consequences of Their
Action: Some of the immediate
consequences of the action of Mr. Galadima is that he and his gang (unless
those who have disassociated themselves from his Press Release) have committed
several criminal infractions as well as given rise to civil injury against the
APC which include; Impersonation:
Mr. Galadima in his Press Release
copiously referred to himself as the substantive Chairman of R-APC a variant of
APC whilst he knows full well that there is indeed no such political party in
Nigeria. Also, he also suggests that he is the substantive Chairman of APC even
though he knows that Com. Adams Oshiomole is indeed the party Chairman and Mr.
Galadima never contested for Chairmanship at the just concluded convention of
the APC. In the circumstance, Mr. Galadima has committed the offence of
Personation as defined and punishable under Section 484 of the Criminal Code
and the authorities will be requested to do their work in bringing him to
account. Fraudulent Misrepresentation:
To the extent that Mr. Galadima continues to perpetuate a falsehood
knowing such falsehood of him forming a Political Party overnight and being
Chairman either of same party or APC indeed to be untrue yet persists for the
purpose of gaining either pecuniary or other benefits, he is guilty of
fraudulent misrepresentation. In Ikechukwu Ikpa vs. The State (2018) 4 NWLR
Part 1069 Page 175 – 240, the Supreme Court defines Fraudulent
Misrepresentation to mean; ‘a false statement that is known to be false or is
made recklessly without knowing or caring whether it is true or false and that
is intended to induce a party to detrimentally rely on it.’ In this case, Mr.
Galadima knowingly made his false statement with the clear intention of
deceiving Nigerians to abandon the APC and instead follow him and his gang.
Conduct Likely To Breach Public Peace: Without a doubt, the declaration of Mr.
Galadima if left unchecked is capable of leading to the public nuisance and a
breach of peace across Country. Our loyal members are already agitated by the
incendiary action of this group which runs counter to the beliefs, principles
and creed of the APC. Breach of Trademark and Infringement of Copy Right:
This for us is one of the key
points of this address. We trust relevant authorities to deal with the criminal
conducts of this group. However as it touches on our brand we are forced to
quickly take steps to protect it from being subjected to erosion by the
thoughtless actions of this group. As Nigerians are aware, the coinage APC is
both a mark and a copy right capable of being protected under the common law
principles of passing off as well as under the extant provisions of the
Copyright’s Act. Nigerians can only imagine what it would be like if we were to
wake up one morning to a bank claiming to the Reformed First Bank Plc or a
Construction company claiming to be the Reformed Julius Berger Plc formed by a
group of its directors allegedly because they disagree with certain decisions
taken at the board meeting! This will be viewed as a blatant assault on the
brand for which both civil and criminal recourse can be sought. So is it in
this case that APC is a brand owned by its teeming members who have invested
the National Executive Committee and other organs of the party with the power
to protect this brand from abuse and erosion. We practice a multi-party
democratic system and therefore cannot stop Mr. Galadima from forming his own
political party if he so desires. However, he will not be allowed to do so
using the APC brand. For the infringement so far committed by Mr. Galadima and
the odium he has brought upon the APC brand we will be seeking civil redress
against his person and that of his group. With respect to the criminal aspect
of his conduct, we will be notifying the appropriate authorities to do the
needful. Fellow Nigerians, in 2015, we witnessed a seismic event where for the
first time in our political history an opposition party defeated an incumbent.
We opened our arms to work with all Nigerians because we believe in the
inherent goodness of all Nigerians. However, we have had to battle with the
manifest desperation of a few overlords who consider every segment of Nigeria
their personal property.
The government of President
Muhammad Buhari and the leadership of our great party are committed to winning
the battle for the soul of Nigeria, securing it from further pillaging by these
rent seekers and deliver the dividends of democracy to all Nigerians without
regards for tribe, religion and social status. This requires us to cleanse our
political process of people who have become accustomed to brigandage and being
unruly. Politics and leadership are enterprises that should summon the best in
us not expose the worst in us. Let those who are in doubt hear this, APC under
the current leadership will work with the leadership of President Muhammad
Buhari to sanitize our political space and we will start with Mr. Galadima and his group to show that there is no room
today for the impunity of old.
Babatunde OGALA, Esq National
Legal Adviser; All Progressives Congress
(APC)
Comments
Post a Comment